It has come to my attention that I am unable to read short stories. I think I’ve always had this particular deficiency, but it’s only been recently that I’ve actually noticed it.
See, the Beloved Husband has recently developed an enjoyment of comic books, so we’re amassing quite a collection. Because I enjoy graphic novels, I figured I’d dive in too, so I picked up a few of the comics when he was finished. But, for the life of me, I could not get into them – not enough to care to move on to the next installment in the series, at any rate.
The same thing happened when I was reading Neil Gaiman’s Fragile Things. The stories were fun – I enjoyed them, but I just stopped reading after a while. And once I stopped reading, I just never got around to picking the book up again.
These two events happened pretty close together and puzzled me exceedingly. I’ve always chuckled that I’ll read just about anything (barring textbooks), but here I was leaving stories unfinished left and right!
I think I’ve figured out what the problem is though.
Short stories are too short.
There simply isn’t enough time or material to really suck me in. In full-length novels, there’s always another page right there, just waiting to be read. That keeps me reading, even when the story itself is lackluster. In short stories and comic books, that “just one more page” attitude that I have doesn’t go far, because I run out of pages pretty quickly.
So, who knew that being an endurance reader would cause problems in the shorter read department? The follow-up question would be: do I force myself to read short stuff and train myself out of this reading quirk, or do I just wait for the compilations/collections of the individual stories to come out?




4 responses to “The Problem With Short Stories”
Marianne Campbell
June 26th, 2012 at 16:27
IMHO short stories are a different animal than novels. Perhaps you’re lumping them into a (mental) category in which they don’t belong and therein lies your dilemma. Short stories are often more of an hors d’oeuvre than than the six-course feast provided by a novel. That’s not to say that short stories can’t be “deep” but rather they are, by necessity, succinct! I can’t say I’ve ever become “lost” in a short story but I have certainly pondered what was in them more than I do when reading novels.
Golden Bookwyrm
June 29th, 2012 at 13:54
Short stories are designed, I think, to pack a punch – since they have to convey their point in fewer words. The only short story that I’ve ever really felt “sucked into” is Mark Twain’s sketch about the Garden of Eden, and that one had plenty to ponder afterwards!
timeoftheday
August 1st, 2012 at 14:37
I have the same issue as you. Short stories are too short for me to get attached, and a lot of times I come across them in anthologies. Skipping from cast to cast, location to location, with nothing in common. I just give up.
Must be 200 pages or more.
Golden Bookwyrm
August 1st, 2012 at 16:52
Perhaps you and I are making the mistake of trying to “marathon” read our way through these anthologies the same way that we go about reading our full-length novels. Though the danger is, if I put a collection of short stories down, I might not pick it up again due to lack of momentum.
Like you, I think I’ll stick to 200+ pages!